This means your security and experience on this site might be hindered. Updating a browser is quick, allows you to experience the modern web, and keeps you safe. Update my browser now
On March 28, 2023, the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, the Honourable Chrystia Freeland, presented Budget 2023 – A Made-in-Canada Plan: Strong Middle Class, Affordable Economy, Healthy Future, to the House of Commons.
No changes were made to personal or corporate tax rates or to the inclusion rate on taxable capital gains. Some highlights include the following:
Individuals will owe AMT if the tax amount calculated under the AMT regime is greater than the tax calculated under the ordinary progressive tax rate regime. Under the current rules, the calculation of AMT allows fewer deductions, exemptions and tax credits than under the ordinary income tax rules and applies a flat 15% tax on income over a standard $40,000 exemption.
Budget 2023 proposes several changes to the AMT calculation. First, the AMT rate is proposed to increase from 15% to 20.5%.
Second, the exemption would increase from $40,000 to the start of the fourth tax bracket (for 2024 this is approximately $173,000). Third, the AMT base would be broadened by further limiting tax preferences (i.e., exemptions, deductions and credits) as follows:
The ability to recover AMT in the seven subsequent years, to the extent that tax computed under the ordinary progressive tax rate regime exceeds AMT, is not proposed to change.
The proposed changes would come into force for the 2024 personal tax year.
Individuals and families with modest incomes receive the Goods and Services Tax Credit (GSTC). The maximum 2022/2023 GSTC is $467 for a single person, and $612 plus $161 per child for a married or common-law couple. Budget 2023 proposes a one-time payment called the Grocery Rebate which will equal half of the annual maximum (twice the quarterly payment received in January, 2023) to be paid as soon as possible after the legislation is passed.
Under the current law, a tradesperson can claim a deduction of up to $500 of eligible new tools acquired in a taxation year as a condition of employment. Budget 2023 proposes to double the maximum employment deduction for tradespeople’s tools from $500 to $1,000, effective for 2023 and subsequent taxation years. As a consequence of this change, extraordinary tool costs that are eligible to be deducted under the apprentice vehicle mechanics’ tools deduction would be those costs that exceed the combined amount of the increased deduction for tradespeople’s tool expenses ($1,000) and the Canada employment credit ($1,368 in 2023) or 5% of the taxpayer’s income earned as an apprentice mechanic, whichever is greater. Registered Education Savings Plans (RESPs)
Government grants and investment income can be withdrawn from RESPs as an education assistance payment (EAP) when a beneficiary is enrolled in an eligible post-secondary program. These withdrawals are taxable.
Under the current law, beneficiaries that are full-time students cannot withdraw more than $5,000 in EAPs in respect of the first 13 consecutive weeks of enrollment in a 12-month period. For part-time students, the limit is $2,500 per 13-week period. Budget 2023 proposes to increase these limits to $8,000 for full-time students and $4,000 for part-time students.
Budget 2023 also proposes to enable divorced or separated parents to open joint RESPs for one or more of their children or to move an existing joint RESP to another promoter. Under the current law, only spouses or common-law partners can jointly enter into an agreement with an RESP promoter to open an RESP.
These changes would come into force on Budget Day.
Where the contractual competence of a person with a disability who is 18 years of age or older is in doubt, the RDSP plan holder must be that person’s guardian or legal representative. A temporary measure allowed the person’s parent, spouse or common-law partner (a “qualifying family member”) to open an RDSP and be the plan holder where the person does not have a legal representative.
Budget 2023 proposes to extend this measure by three years, to December 31, 2026. Budget 2023 also proposes to broaden the definition of qualifying family members to include a brother or sister of the beneficiary who is 18 years of age or older. Qualifying family members who become a plan holder before the end of 2026 could remain the plan holder after 2026.
These proposals would apply as of royal assent of the enacting legislation.
An RCA is type of employer-sponsored arrangement that generally allows an employer to provide supplemental pension benefits to employees. A refundable tax is imposed at a rate of 50% on contributions to an RCA trust, as well as on income and gains earned or realized by the trust. The tax is generally refunded as the retirement benefits are paid to the employee. The employer receives a full deduction for contributions made to the RCA.
Employers who do not pre-fund supplemental retirement benefits through contributions to an RCA trust and instead settle retirement benefit obligations as they become due, can obtain a letter of credit (or a surety bond) issued by a financial institution in order to provide security to their employees. To secure or renew the letter of credit, the employer pays an annual fee or premium charged by the issuer. These fees and premiums are subject to the 50% refundable tax.
Budget 2023 proposes that fees or premiums paid for the purposes of securing or renewing a letter of credit (or a surety bond) for an RCA that is supplemental to a registered pension plan will not be subject to the refundable tax. This change would apply to fees or premiums paid on or after Budget Day.
Budget 2023 also proposes to allow employers to request a refund of previously remitted refundable taxes in respect of such fees or premiums paid in prior years. They would be entitled to recover 50% of retirement benefits paid after 2023, to a maximum of the refundable taxes paid in the past.
Historically where parents transferred shares of their corporation to a corporation owned by their children, deemed dividends rather than capital gains would arise on the disposition (due to Section 84.1 of the Income Tax Act). In 2021, legislation was passed (Bill C-208) to provide an exception from this deemed dividend treatment to facilitate the transfer of family businesses to the next generation. This exception allowed parents to utilize the lifetime capital gains exemption or simply receive capital gain treatment on the disposition, and enjoy the same tax benefits available on a sale to unrelated third parties.
However, the government was concerned that this exception contained insufficient safeguards and may have provided an inappropriate tax advantage where there was no transfer of a business to the next generation.
More specifically, this exception did not require that:
Budget 2023 proposes to amend these rules to ensure that they apply only where a genuine intergenerational business transfer (IBT) takes place.
A genuine IBT under the current law would be a transfer of shares of a corporation (the Transferred Corporation) by an individual shareholder (the Transferor) to another corporation (the Purchaser Corporation) where both of the following conditions are satisfied:
To ensure that only genuine IBTs are excluded from the deemed dividend rules, Budget 2023 proposes additional conditions be added. To provide flexibility, taxpayers who wish to undertake a genuine IBT may choose to rely on one of two transfer options:
The immediate transfer rule would provide finality earlier in the process, though with more stringent conditions. In recognition that not all business transfers are immediate, the gradual transfer rule would provide additional flexibility for those who choose that approach.
Both the immediate and gradual business transfer options would reflect the hallmarks of a genuine IBT. The chart on the next page outlines the proposed conditions to qualify as a genuine IBT under each option.
When the current exception was introduced, it was intended that there be restrictions for transfers of large corporations. However, these restrictions were not effectively implemented. Budget 2023 indicates that there would be no limit on the value of shares transferred in reliance upon this rule.
The current exception includes restrictions on sale of the business by the purchaser corporation within five years of the share transfer. Budget 2023 proposes that these requirements would be eliminated. In addition, new relieving rules would apply to deem requirements 3, 4 and 5 in the above chart to be met in respect of a child where either of the following occurs:
In order to benefit from the exception to the deemed dividends, the Transferor and child(ren) would be required to jointly elect for the transfer to qualify as either an immediate or gradual intergenerational share transfer. The child(ren) would be jointly and severally liable for any additional taxes payable by the Transferor on deemed dividends resulting from a transfer that does not meet the above conditions. The joint election and joint and several liability recognize that the actions of the child could potentially cause the parent to fail the conditions and to be reassessed in this regard.
The limitation period for reassessing the Transferor’s liability for tax that may arise on the transfer is proposed to be extended by three years for an immediate business transfer and by ten years for a gradual business transfer, ensuring that the Transferor can be reassessed if the requirements are not met throughout the applicable period.
Budget 2023 also proposes to provide a ten-year capital gains reserve for genuine intergenerational share transfers that satisfy the above proposed conditions, which would allow capital gains to be brought into income over a period of up to ten years, in proportion to proceeds received. The normal limit for such reserves is five years.
These rules would apply to share sales occurring on or after January 1, 2024.
An EOT is a form of employee ownership where a trust holds shares of a corporation for the benefit of the corporation’s employees. EOTs can be used to facilitate the acquisition by employees of their employer’s business, without requiring them to pay directly to acquire shares. This will provide business owners an additional option for succession planning. Budget 2023 proposes new rules to facilitate the use of EOTs to acquire and hold shares of a business.
The following subsections describe the general rules that would apply to EOTs. Complex requirements are set out in draft legislation included in the Budget papers.
To be an EOT, a trust would be required to be resident in Canada (excluding deemed resident trusts) and have only two purposes. First, it would hold shares of qualifying businesses for the benefit of the employee beneficiaries of the trust. Second, it would make distributions to employee beneficiaries, where reasonable, under a distribution formula that could only consider an employee’s length of service, remuneration and hours worked. Otherwise, all beneficiaries must generally be treated in a similar manner.
An EOT would be required to hold a controlling interest in the shares of the qualifying business. A qualifying business would need to meet certain conditions. It would be required to be a Canadian-controlled private corporation. All or substantially all of the fair market value of its assets must be attributable to assets used in an active business carried on in Canada. A qualifying business would not be able to carry on business as a partner in a partnership. An EOT would not be permitted to allocate shares of a qualifying business to individual beneficiaries. Trustees of the EOT would be elected by the beneficiaries every five years. Individuals who held a significant economic interest in a business prior to its acquisition by the EOT would not be able to make up more than 40% of the trustees of the EOT, the directors of a corporation serving as a trustee of the EOT or the directors of any qualifying business owned by the EOT. This limit would also include persons related to such individuals.
Trust beneficiaries would be limited to qualifying employees. Individuals, and persons related to them, who hold, or held prior to the disposition to the EOT, a significant economic interest in the business would be excluded from being qualifying employees.
The EOT would be a taxable trust and will be generally subject to the same rules as other personal trusts. Therefore, undistributed trust income would be taxed in the EOT at the top personal marginal tax rate. If the EOT distributes dividends received from the qualifying business, those dividends would retain their character when received by employee beneficiaries and would be eligible for the dividend tax credit.
A qualifying business transfer would occur when a taxpayer disposes of shares of a qualifying business for proceeds that do not exceed fair market value. The shares must be disposed of to either a trust that qualifies as an EOT immediately after the sale or a corporation owned 100% by the EOT. The EOT must own a controlling interest in the qualifying business immediately after the qualifying business transfer.
These amendment would apply as of January 1, 2024.
Budget 2023 proposes to introduce a 15% refundable tax credit for eligible investments in:
Both new projects and the refurbishment of existing facilities will be eligible. Taxable and non-taxable entities such as Crown corporations and publicly owned utilities, corporations owned by Indigenous communities, and pension funds, would be eligible. The clean electricity investment tax credit could be claimed in addition to the Atlantic investment tax credit, but generally not with any other investment tax credit.
In order to access the tax credit in each province and territory, other requirements will include a commitment by a competent authority that the federal funding will be used to lower electricity bills, and a commitment to achieve a net-zero electricity sector by 2035.
The clean electricity investment tax credit would be available as of Budget Day 2024 for projects that did not begin construction before Budget Day 2023. The credit would not be available after 2034.
Budget 2023 proposes to introduce the clean hydrogen refundable investment tax credit for investments made in clean hydrogen production based on the lifecycle carbon intensity of hydrogen (previously noted in the 2022 Fall Economic Statement). The amount of the credit, which ranges from 15% to 40%, is based on assessed carbon intensity of the hydrogen that is produced (i.e., kilogram (kg) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per kg of hydrogen).
The credit would be available in respect of the cost of purchasing and installing eligible equipment for projects that produce hydrogen from electrolysis or natural gas (so long as emissions are abated using carbon capture, utilization, and storage).
Property that is required to convert clean hydrogen to clean ammonia would also be eligible for the credit, at the lowest credit rate of 15%.
This measure would apply to property that is acquired and that becomes available for use on or after Budget Day. The credit would be fully phased out for property that becomes available for use after 2034.
The 2022 Fall Economic Statement proposed a 30% clean technology investment tax credit for Canadian businesses adopting in clean technology and investing in eligible property that is acquired and that becomes available for use on or after Budget Day 2023. Eligible capital costs include investments in:
Budget 2023 proposes to expand eligibility of the tax credit to include geothermal energy systems that are eligible for Class 43.1 of Schedule II of the Income Tax Regulations. The expansion would apply in respect of property that is acquired and becomes available for use on or after Budget Day, where it has not been used for any purpose before its acquisition.
The phase-out of the credit would commence in 2034, rather than 2032 as previously announced.
Budget 2022 proposed a refundable investment tax credit for the cost of purchasing and installing eligible equipment used in an eligible CCUS project for businesses that incur eligible expenses starting on January 1, 2022.
Budget 2023 proposes the following changes in respect of the CCUS, with details to be released in the coming months:
These measures would apply to eligible expenses incurred after 2021 and before 2041.
Budget 2023 proposes to implement the government’s intention to attach prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements to the proposed clean electricity, clean technology and clean hydrogen investment tax credits. In general, the rates available for these credits will be reduced by 10% if the following labour two requirements are not met.
The requirements would apply to work performed on or after October 1, 2023. Budget 2023 also indicated that labour requirements are intended to apply to the investment tax credit for carbon capture, utilization, and storage, with details to be announced at a later date.
Budget 2023 proposes to introduce a 30% refundable investment tax credit for clean technology manufacturing and processing, and critical mineral extraction and processing, on the capital cost of eligible property associated with eligible activities, including:
The credit would apply to property that is acquired and becomes available for use on or after January 1, 2024. The credit would be gradually phased out, starting with property that becomes available for use in 2032 and would no longer be in effect for property that becomes available for use after 2034.
For a particular property, businesses would be able to claim only the investment tax credits for carbon capture, utilization and storage; clean technologies; clean electricity; or clean technology manufacturing. However, multiple tax credits could be available for the same project if the project includes different types of eligible property.
In 2021, the corporate income tax rate for qualifying zero-emission technology manufacturers was reduced by 50%. Budget 2023 proposes to expand eligible activities to include the following nuclear manufacturing and processing activities:
This expansion would apply for taxation years beginning after 2023.
Budget 2023 proposes to extend the availability of these reduced rates by three years, such that the planned phase-out would start in taxation years that begin in 2032. The measure would be fully phased out for taxation years that begin after 2034.
The 2022 Fall Economic Statement announced the government’s intention to introduce a 2% tax on the net value of all types of share repurchases by public corporations in Canada. Budget 2023 provides the design and implementation details of the proposed measure. The tax would apply only to public corporations (Canadian-resident corporations whose shares are listed on a designated stock exchange).
It would not apply to mutual fund corporations, but would apply to real estate investment trusts, specified investment flow-through (SIFT) trusts and SIFT partnerships if they have units listed on a designated stock exchange.
The proposed tax would apply in respect of repurchases and issuances of equity that occur on or after January 1, 2024.
The GAAR in the Income Tax Act is intended to prevent abusive tax avoidance transactions while not interfering with legitimate commercial and family transactions. If abusive tax avoidance is established, the GAAR applies to deny the tax benefit created by the abusive transaction.
A consultation on various approaches to modernizing and strengthening the GAAR has recently been conducted. A consultation paper released last August identified a number of issues with the GAAR and set out potential ways to address them. As part of the consultation, the government received a number of submissions, representing a wide variety of viewpoints.
A preamble would be added to the GAAR, in order to help address interpretive issues and ensure that the GAAR applies as intended. While the GAAR informs the interpretation of, and applies to, every other provision of the Income Tax Act, it fundamentally denies tax benefits sought to be obtained through abusive tax avoidance transactions. It in effect draws a line: while taxpayers are free to arrange their affairs so as to obtain tax benefits intended by Parliament, they cannot misuse or abuse the tax rules to obtain unintended benefits. The preamble would also clarify that the GAAR is intended to apply regardless of whether or not the tax planning strategy used to obtain the tax benefit was foreseen.
The threshold for an “avoidance transaction” potentially subject to the GAAR would be reduced from a “primary purpose” test to a “one of the main purposes” test. This is consistent with the standard used in many modern anti-avoidance rules in other countries and is considered by the government to strike a reasonable balance, as it would apply to transactions with a significant tax avoidance purpose but not to transactions where tax was simply a consideration.
A rule would be added to the GAAR to better meet the objective of requiring economic substance in addition to literal compliance with the words of the Income Tax Act. Currently, Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence has established a more limited role for economic substance.
The proposed amendments would provide that economic substance is to be considered at the ‘misuse or abuse’ stage of the GAAR analysis and that a lack of economic substance tends to indicate abusive tax avoidance. A lack of economic substance will not always mean that a transaction is abusive. It would still be necessary to determine the object, spirit and purpose of the provisions or scheme relied upon, in line with existing GAAR jurisprudence. In cases where the tax results sought are consistent with the purpose of the provisions or scheme relied upon, abusive tax avoidance would not be found even in cases lacking economic substance.
The amendments would provide indicators for determining whether a transaction or series of transactions lacks economic substance. These are not an exhaustive list of factors that might be relevant and different indicators might be relevant in different cases. However, in many cases, the government believes that the existence of one or more of these indicators would strongly point to a transaction lacking economic substance. These indicators are:
Budget 2023 provided the example of an individual contributing to a tax-free savings account. Such a transfer could be considered to be entirely tax motivated, with no change in economic position or potential for profit other than as a result of tax savings. Even if the transfer is considered to be lacking in economic substance, it is clearly not a misuse or abuse of the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act. The individual is using their tax-free savings account in precisely the manner that Parliament intended. There are contribution rules that specifically contemplate such a transfer and, perhaps more fundamentally, the basic tax-free savings account rules would not work if such a transfer was considered abusive.
The proposal would not supplant the general approach under Canadian income tax law, which focuses on the legal form of an arrangement. In particular, it would not require an enquiry into what the economic substance of a transaction actually is (e.g., whether a particular financial instrument is, in substance, debt or equity). Rather, it would require consideration of a lack of economic substance in the determination of abusive tax avoidance.
A penalty would be introduced for transactions subject to the GAAR, equal to 25% of the amount of the tax benefit. Where the tax benefit involves a tax attribute that has not yet been used to reduce tax, the amount of the tax benefit would be considered to be nil. The penalty could be avoided if the transaction is disclosed to CRA, either as part of mandatory disclosure rules which are currently proposed or voluntarily.
A three-year extension to the normal reassessment period would be provided for GAAR assessments, unless the transaction had been disclosed to CRA as discussed above.
Budget 2023 announced a consultation on these proposals to close on May 31, 2023. Following this consultation, the government intends to publish revised legislative proposals and announce the application date of the amendments.
Corporations are able to deduct dividends received on shares of other corporations resident in Canada in computing their taxable income, preventing the same earnings being subject to multiple levels of corporate taxation. The government considers this treatment inconsistent with the mark-to-market rules that essentially classify gains on portfolio shares held by banks as business income. Budget 2023 proposes to deny the dividend deduction in respect of dividends received by financial institutions on shares that are mark-to-market property, effective for dividends received after 2023.
A credit union (as defined for income tax and GST purposes) benefits from a GST/HST rule allowing it to receive most taxable supplies of goods and services from credit union centrals and other credit unions on an exempt basis. The definition prevents a credit union that earns more than 10% of its revenue from sources other than certain specified sources (such as interest income from lending activities) from meeting the definition of “credit union,” and qualifying for the special income tax and GST/HST rules governing credit unions. This could arise even though the credit union’s governing legislation permits it to earn revenue from these other sources. Most credit unions are currently full-service financial institutions that offer a comprehensive suite of financial products and services. Budget 2023 proposes to eliminate the revenue test from the definition of “credit union” and amend that definition to accommodate how credit unions currently operate, effective for taxation years ending after 2016.
Canada is one of 137 members of the OECD/Group of 20 (G20) Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the Inclusive Framework) that have joined a two-pillar plan for international tax reform agreed to on October 8, 2021. Budget 2023 reiterates Canada’s commitment to the framework, and its intention to implement the Pillar One (intended to reallocate a portion of taxing rights over the profits of the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises to market countries where their users and customers are located) and Pillar Two (intended to ensure that the profits of large multinational enterprises are subject to an effective tax rate of at least 15%, regardless of where they are earned) initiatives.
Budget 2023 announces the government’s intention to introduce legislation implementing the income inclusion rule and a domestic minimum top-up tax applicable to Canadian entities of MNEs that are within scope of Pillar Two, with effect for fiscal years of MNEs that begin on or after December 31, 2023.
Alcohol excise duties are automatically indexed to total Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation at the beginning of each fiscal year (i.e., on April 1st). Budget 2023 proposes to temporarily cap the inflation adjustment for excise duties on beer, spirits and wine at 2%, for one year only, as of April 1, 2023.
Excise duties are imposed on cannabis products, and are generally remittable on a monthly basis. Budget 2022 brought forward a measure that allowed certain smaller licensed cannabis producers to remit excise duties on a quarterly basis. Budget 2023 proposes to allow all licensed cannabis producers to remit excise duties on a quarterly rather than monthly basis, starting from the quarter beginning on April 1, 2023.
The Air Travellers Security charge (ATSC) is generally paid by passengers when they purchase airline tickets. Budget 2023 proposes to increase ATSC rates by 32.85%, noting that these rates were last increased in 2010, at which time they were raised by 52.4%.
The proposed new ATSC rates will apply to air transportation services that include a chargeable emplanement on or after May 1, 2024, for which any payment is made on or after that date. The charge for a domestic one-way flight will rise from $7.48 to $9.94. The transborder charge will increase from $12.71 to $16.89, and the charge for other international travel will increase from $25.91 to $34.42. These rates include the GST or federal portion of HST.
Budget 2023 announced that commitments had been obtained from Visa and Mastercard to lower fees for small businesses. More than 90% of credit card-accepting businesses are expected to see their fees reduced by up to 27%.
Budget 2023 announced that the number of Canadians eligible for CRA’s automatic File My Return service will be increased to 2 million by 2025, almost tripling the number of currently eligible Canadians. In 2022, 53,000 returns were filed using this service. In addition, a new pilot project will be implemented to assist vulnerable Canadians in applying for benefits even if they do not file tax returns.
Budget 2023 proposes increasing Canada student grants by 40%, raising the interest-free Canada student loan limit from $210 to $300 per study week, and waiving the requirement for mature students (aged 22 or older) to undergo credit screening in order to qualify.
The Canadian dental care plan would provide coverage for all uninsured Canadians with an annual family income of less than $90,000 (the Canada dental benefit only provided benefits for children under 12) by the end of 2023. The plan will be administered by Health Canada with support from a third-party benefits administrator. Benefits are reduced for families with income between $70,000 and $90,000.
Budget 2023 proposes to amend the Canada Labour Code to strengthen prohibitions against employee misclassification for federally regulated gig workers such that they will receive protections and benefits including EI and CPP.
Budget 2023 proposes to provide $53.8 million in 2022-23 to Employment and Social Development Canada to support integrity activities relating to overpayments of COVID-19 emergency income supports.
Budget 2023 confirms the government’s intention to proceed with the following previously announced tax and related measures, as modified to take into account consultations and deliberations since their release.
The preceding information is for educational purposes only. As it is impossible to include all situations, circumstances and exceptions in a newsletter such as this, a further review should be done by a qualified professional.
No individual or organization involved in either the preparation or distribution of this letter accepts any contractual, tortious, or any other form of liability for its contents or for any consequences arising from its use.
Our office is happy to help with any questions or issues.Contact Us